Sensor: S_1x5T_90, Data for leakage current measurement , and plot on overall it is a GOOD sensor
| ROC | ROC wafer | Label |
|---|---|---|
| ROC0 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN |
| ROC1 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN |
| ROC2 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN |
| ROC3 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN |
| ROC4 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN |
| Ibias_DAC, Ibias_DAC Data | 156 | 154 | 156 | 174 | 154 |
| Vana, VanaData | 120 | 128 | 123 | 129 | 134 |
| CalDelData and plots | 77 | 75 | 77 | 80 | 83 |
| VthrCompData and plots | 75 | 81 | 79 | 78 | 88 | Depletion Voltage is -250 and suggested operational voltage is -290
| TestDdata ,TestD Plots | 727 | 681 | 262 | 138 | 132 |
| LightData ,Light Plots | 883 | 751 | 283 | 153 | 176 |
| Pass/Fail TestD | BAD | BAD | BAD | BAD | BAD |
| Pass/Fail LIGHT | BAD | BAD | BAD | BAD | BAD |
Noise MAP at VMAX
![[IMAGE] of](P_1x5T_901_C-460-noise.jpg)
Efficiency MAP
![[IMAGE] of](P_1x5T_901_C-460-efficiency.jpg)
EXTRA DACs for NOISE
| VHldDe | 125 | 140 | 150 | 110 | 105 |
| Vsf | 135 | 140 | 135 | 140 | 140 |
| VoffsetOp | 90 | 85 | 85 | 110 | 80 |
| VIbias_PH | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 105 |
| ROC0 NOISE | ![[IMAGE] of](P_1x5T_901_C-460-noise-ROC0-MAP.jpg) | ![[IMAGE] of](P_1x5T_901_C-460-noise-ROC0-HISTO.jpg) | MEAN = 4.125279SIGMA = 0.321909 |
| ROC1 NOISE | ![[IMAGE] of](P_1x5T_901_C-460-noise-ROC1-MAP.jpg) | ![[IMAGE] of](P_1x5T_901_C-460-noise-ROC1-HISTO.jpg) | MEAN = 4.321889SIGMA = 0.354219 |
| ROC2 NOISE | ![[IMAGE] of](P_1x5T_901_C-460-noise-ROC2-MAP.jpg) | ![[IMAGE] of](P_1x5T_901_C-460-noise-ROC2-HISTO.jpg) | MEAN = 4.524095SIGMA = 0.364314 |
| ROC3 NOISE | ![[IMAGE] of](P_1x5T_901_C-460-noise-ROC3-MAP.jpg) | ![[IMAGE] of](P_1x5T_901_C-460-noise-ROC3-HISTO.jpg) | MEAN = 3.426840SIGMA = 0.265716 |
| ROC4 NOISE | ![[IMAGE] of](P_1x5T_901_C-460-noise-ROC4-MAP.jpg) | ![[IMAGE] of](P_1x5T_901_C-460-noise-ROC4-HISTO.jpg) | MEAN = 4.690577SIGMA = 0.381351 |
Comment (if any):
This Device have been tested 0Times prior to this one and here are the links to the previous tests:End testing time: 1:46 PM