|
Phone:
(765) 496-2464 [office]
(765) 494-5971 [lab]
(630) 309-8187 [cell]
(630) 840-8410 [Fermilab office]
Fax:
(765) 494-0706 [Purdue]
(630) 840-2968 [Fermilab]
Office:
Phys 378 (office)
Phys 337 (lab)
Purdue Address:
Department of Physics
Purdue University
525 Northwestern Ave.
West Lafayette, IN 47907-2036
Fermilab address:
Fermilab - CDF/Purdue/MS 318
P.O. Box 500
Batavia, IL 60510
|
Research Interests
Overview
|
My primary area of research is in High Energy Physics. I am currently
a member of the CDF collaboration
which has built and operates one of the two detectors at the
Tevatron - the World's
highest energy proton-antiproton collider, located at the
Fermi National Accelerator Lab.
|
|
Heavy flavor physics at CDF
Colliding protons and anti-protons at high energies makes it possible to
produce and observe the decays of very heavy particles, including the
top quark, as
well as the W and Z intermediate vector bosons. It is also possible that
new, exotic particles could be created in these collisions and the CDF group
at Purdue is actively searching for evidence of their production.
These high energy collisions also give rise to very large cross sections for
the production of bottom and charm quarks. The decays of hadrons containing
bottom quarks are studied at a number of experiments around the world,
including Belle,
BaBar and
CLEO, but these
facilities can only produce the B0 and B+/B- mesons. At the Tevatron, all
types of hadrons containing bottom quarks are produced, which makes it the
only facility currently operating at which one can study the decays of
B0s, Λb and Bc hadrons.
One of the mysteries in modern particle physics is the origin of the complete
asymmetry between matter and anti-matter in the universe. Although not large
enough to explain this observation, one of the only known mechanisms
that can produce a matter anti-matter asymmetry is the process of
CP violation in the Standard Model. The parameters that give rise to this
effect (the elements of the CKM matrix) are difficult to measure
reliably and it is only recently that a consistent view of this part of the
Standard Model has begun to emerge. Studying the decays of hadrons
containing bottom quarks makes possible a number of new measurements and
tests of the CP sector of the Standard Model. For this reason, the decays
of the B0s mesons are extremely interesting and at this time, they can only be
studied at the Tevatron.
CDF has now made the first unambiguous
observation of Bs
oscillations which is described in the September 25th
Fermilab press release. The Bs oscillates between its
particle and anti-particle states as it propagates in free space. The angular
oscillation frequency, Δms=17.77+-0.10(stat) +- 0.07 (sys) ps-1, imposes constraints on the the shape of
the unitary triangle, which has been analysed by the CKMFitter and UTFit collaborations.
This is one of the most important analyses carried out at CDF and now
makes possible many new measurements, including CP asymmetries in
Bs decays.
This has motivated my past work and my current interests:
b-quark production
- We know that there are several mechanisms by which bottom quarks
can be produced in proton anti-proton collisions. Furthermore, we
know that the triggers we use to identify and record events that
are consistent with heavy flavor production bring in a mixture of
events containing both bottom and charm quarks, as well as background
from QCD processes. Understanding the composition of these event
samples is important for several physics analyses. Some of these
issues are described
here but there are still several unanswered questions that
need further attention.
Identification of B-hadron flavor at production
- This is an important aspect of B-physics analyses that study mixing
and CP-violation in neutral B mesons. From its decay products, we can usually
tell whether a B0 meson containd a b or an anti-b quark at the time
it decayed.
However, to determine whether a B0 meson was mixed or un-mixed at
the time it
decayed requires knowing whether it contained a b quark or an anti-b quark when
it was produced. Making this determination is known as "flavor tagging" and
can be done using a variety of techniques. One method, that relies on the
fact that bottom quarks are produced in pairs, one of which might decay to a
muon is described
here. Another method that is currently under study involves
identifying charged kaons. The ability to identify kaons in events produced
by proton anti-proton collisions was the motivation for instrumenting CDF
with the Time-of-Flight detector.
Associated kaon production
- When a Bs meson is formed, a bottom quark combines with
a strange quark. Because strange quarks are produced in pairs, an
anti-strange quark must remain in close proximity to the resulting
Bs meson, and this could produce a K+ meson.
It has been speculated for quite some time that identifying K+
mesons produced in association with a Bs meson should provide a
method to tag the flavor of the b-quark at the time that the Bs
meson was produced. In October, 2005, we provided the
first direct observation of kaons produced in associaton with
Bs mesons, which relied on the Time-of-Flight
detector to identify charged kaons.
We are now analysing associated kaon produciton in great detail using
a high statistics sample of Ds+-->φπ+
decays.
Decays of Bs mesons
- Because Bs mesons are not produced at other "B-factories", we
currently know very little about many of their decay modes. One class of
B0 decays that has attracted considerable interest involves the
production of P-wave charm mesons. These have never been observed in the
Bs system
but we expect to be able to observe a statistically significant number of
Bs decays to the D+s1 meson.
Particle identification in p p-bar collisions
|
Over the past six years, I have played a lead role in the design, constriction
and commissioning of a Time-of-Flight detector that was a new addition to CDF
for Run-II. This detector measures the times at which charged particles arrive
at a set of scintillation counters, located just outside the CDF tracking
volume, with a precision of ~100 ps. This new capability makes it possible
to distinguish between charged kaons and pions in the momentum range
p<1.5 GeV/c and between protons and pions in the momentum range
p<3 GeV/c. The CDF-II TOF system required building and testing
about 450 photomultiplier tube assemblies and preamplifiers, as well as 432
channels of custom electronics to digitize the time and amplitude of the PMT
pulses.
|
| Data from the TOF detector makes it possible to
statistically identify pure samples of kaons, pions and protons that are used
as input to calibrate the ionization energy loss (dE/dx) of CDF's tracking
chamber. The combination of TOF and dE/dx can provide unambiguous particle
identification at low momenta, and gives at least 1 sigma statistical
separation between kaons and pions above 2 GeV/c. This is an essential
part of several of the analyses described above.
|
|
|
I am currently involved with studies of the TOF calibration and reconstruction.
Part of this effort includes building an electronics module to send
clock signals to both the TOF electronics and to the electronics that
reads out the CDF-II luminosity monitor. The luminosity monitor provides
additional information about the time at which the proton anti-proton
interaction occurred. A study of the correllations between the times measured
with the TOF detector and the luminosity monitor can help understand systematic
effects that are present in TOF event reconstruction and can
improve the precision with which we perform particle identification.
|
Trigger electronics upgrade
|
One of the unique capabilities of the CDF-II detector is the ability to
identify and trigger on events that are consistent with the production
of bottom or charm hadrons. This is possible because these particles
have lifetimes that are of the order of 1 ps and can travel of order
0.5 mm before they decay. Because of this, the tracks that their decay
products leave in the detector do not point back to the point at which
proton and anti-proton collision took place. The identification of these
displaced tracks is the basis for the Level 2 Secondary Vertex Trigger.
The Secondary Vertex Trigger requires the identification of the high momentum
tracks in an event every 396 ns. This is done using the eXtremely Fast Track
processor that is part of the CDF-II Level 1 trigger. The XFT processor
identifies tracks by the patterns of hits that they leave on the wires in
CDF's central tracking chamber. A limitation of the current XFT design is
that at high luminosities, the trigger rate is dominated by fake tracks that
are incorrectly identified because of the large number of overlapping low
momentum tracks produced in inelastic proton anti-proton collisions.
|
|
The original specification for the XFT system had it producing a trigger
decision every 132 ns and it was only possible to classify the times at
which wires were hit as either being "prompt" or "delayed". Because we
now know that a trigger decision is required only every 396 ns, it is possible
to tripple the amount of information used in the trigger decision. The
use of this additional information is one upgrade path that will reduce
the rate of fake triggers. The current XFT system also identifies tracks using
only the wires in the 4 axial superlayers of the tracking chamber but
additional information is available from the outer two stereo superlayers as
well. Along with Ohio State University, the University of Illinois and others,
the CDF group at Purdue will develop electronics hardware to make use
of this additional information. This project, that will continue throughout
2004-05, can extend the B-physics capabilities of CDF-II as the Tevatron
luminosity increases over the next several years.
|
|
Other experiments
I have also worked with the OPAL
experiment, located at CERN, and the
SLD detector
at the Stanford Linear Accelerator
Center.
Courses
Physics 42200
- Spring, 2013 - Waves and Oscillations
Physics 29000
- Spring, 2013 - Service Learning: Quarknet Outreach
Physics 24100
- Fall, 2012 - Electricity and Optics
Physics 56500
- Spring, 2012 - Introduction to Particle Physics II
Physics 56500
- Spring, 2011 - Introduction to Particle Physics II
Physics 56500
- Spring, 2010 - Introduction to Particle Physics II
Physics 536
- Spring, 2009 - Electronic Techniques for Research
Physics 536
- Spring, 2008 - Electronic Techniques for Research
Physics 564
- Fall, 2007 - Introduction to Elementary Particle Physics
Physics 536 - Spring, 2007 - Electronic Techniques for Research
Physics 310 - Fall, 2006 - Intermediate Mechanics
Physics 218
- Spring, 2006 - General Physics
Physics 564
- Fall, 2005 - Introduction to Elementary Particle Physics
Physics 218
- Spring, 2005 - General Physics
Physics 310
- Fall, 2004 - Intermediate Mechanics
Physics 564
- Fall, 2003 - Introduction to Elementary Particle Physics
Education and Outreach
Last updated Mon Aug 25 12:25:22 EDT 2008
mjones@physics.purdue.edu