OPTOELECTRONICS

Meetings

June 2007
07 export to personal scheduler Proposal B Meeting: Radiation Damage Studies of OE Components for the SLHC    
May 2007
21 export to personal scheduler SLHC Proposal B Meeting: Radiation Damage Studies of OE components    
April 2007
30 export to personal scheduler Proposal B Meeting: Radiation Damage Studies of OE Components for the SLHC    
18 export to personal scheduler Joint ATLAS CMS SLHC Optoelectronics Working Group, Theme C    
02 export to personal scheduler Proposal B Meeting: Radiation Damage Studies of OE Components for the SLHC    
March 2007
19 export to personal scheduler Joint ATLAS CMS SLHC Optoelectronics Working Group    
o 2006
June 2006
23 export to personal scheduler Opto-Electronic Readout Systems for SLHC    
 
o 2005
May 2005
09 export to personal scheduler Opto-Electronic Readout Systems for SLHC    
 
 
 
 

Meetings:

Opto-Electronic Readout Systems for SLHC Monday 09 May 2005

ATLAS CMS SLHC Optoelectronics Working Group  Monday March 19 -2007

Proposal B Meeting: Radiation Damage Studies of OE Components for the SLHC














 
News

To all CMS collaborators

On 19 July we have scheduled a meeting on SLHC tracking and trigger
upgrades. This is part of the series of meetings concerned with a
tracker upgrade for SLHC:
CMS Tracker at SLHC


The meeting will be held in CERN. See
"Joint SLHC Trigger-Tracker meeting"
for the agenda, which will be drafted soon.

The meeting is open to all CMS collaborators. We are seeking ideas as
to how best to solve the difficult problem of incoroporating tracking
into the L1 trigger at the SLHC to contain the rate to 100 kHz. We are
looking for methods for generating tracking trigger primitives as well
as methods of seeding the tracker in Level-1 from the Level-1
calorimeter or muon trigger information.

We foresee a number of introductory talks but would like to devote much
of the meeting to discussion, including short presentations of any
ideas. Some concepts have been presented in the past but it is too soon
to commit to a single one as all of the proposals have their own
advantages and potential drawbacks. Even if a concept is not worked out
in detail, we would like to understand if there is scope for
implementing a 'simple' solution, since the objective is only to
contain the rate, not to develop a hardware tracking trigger nor
provide any particular level of precision. We would also like to
understand as best we can the information needed to progress to a
feasibility study.

If you would like to make a presentation, please contact one of us.

regards
Geoff Hall (Geoff.Hall@cern.ch)
Wesley Smith (wsmith@hep.wisc.edu)